- Posts: 5124
- Thank you received: 0
vvc or non vvc
16 years 5 months ago #107619
by Woody
Replied by Woody on topic vvc or non vvc
55bhp is a mass improvement, all depends on how far you wanna go/how much hassle <!-- s:lol: --><img src="{SMILIES_PATH}/icon_lol.gif" alt="
" title="Laughing" /><!-- s:lol: -->
" title="Laughing" /><!-- s:lol: --> Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
16 years 5 months ago #107623
by retro dan
Metro POWER!
With the origano flavour!
IF YOU CAN M.O.T. IT, IT'S NOT LOW ENOUGH!
Replied by retro dan on topic vvc or non vvc
1.6. Or the 1.8 ZT turbo lump. 1.6 is what you ideally want, the 1.8 takes forever to get grip, 1.6's just cope. Plus better on acceleration because not putting power down.
Or i may be able to get hold of a 1.4 gti engine which is better than both.. 105 bhp then turbo it
Or i may be able to get hold of a 1.4 gti engine which is better than both.. 105 bhp then turbo it
Metro POWER!
With the origano flavour!
IF YOU CAN M.O.T. IT, IT'S NOT LOW ENOUGH!
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
16 years 5 months ago #107893
by Brookesy91
Replied by Brookesy91 on topic vvc or non vvc
I think VVC mate
be alot more fun to drive i reckon
be alot more fun to drive i reckon
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
16 years 5 months ago #107929
by retro dan
Metro POWER!
With the origano flavour!
IF YOU CAN M.O.T. IT, IT'S NOT LOW ENOUGH!
Replied by retro dan on topic vvc or non vvc
You will still have to modify W/L and mounting points 
Metro POWER!
With the origano flavour!
IF YOU CAN M.O.T. IT, IT'S NOT LOW ENOUGH!
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.